I have long since had the impression that the rate of time that we experience reality, as humans, is governed by neurochemical processes that are largely similar between most peoples' brains, at least when the brains are working "properly". We can alter this rate with stuff; psychedelics, natural doses of adrenaline, opioids, whatever. And sleep? Sleep is like forced time travel, and personally, I'm sick of doing it. But anyway.

Physics doesn't really care about time. The laws of physics work perfectly well for a reversal of time. An increase in entropy signals what we have defined as the "positive" time direction, but physics may never tell us why humans can only seem to experience time towards the positive direction, and physics may forbid construction of a time machine. We don't know yet that the universe holds a single functioning wormhole, through which traversing wouldn't kill our fragile beings. We've got a lot to learn, and some of it may be unknowable, chalked up to a condition of the human consciousness.

Here's a weird example, the Twin Paradox. For the twin who is flown away and returns on a near-light-speed rocketship, I will posit that the perceived rate of physical processes is unaltered; that one second as kept by an atomic clock one the rocketship will be perceived as one second, not some fraction of a second proportional to the time dilation given by special relativity. One thing I liked about Interstellar was that it was a popular, recent movie to (somewhat) accurately portray the potential effects of relativity on human relationships and progress. Won't talk about this any more, 'cuz spoilers, but if you've seen the movie you probably remember that one scene that's relevant to the beginning of this paragraph.

I believe everything in the article, but I think that the nature of time is far more complex than our current best guesses. Guess I'm kinda agnostic on the subject of time as well as the subject of a creator.