It's definitely a little sanctimonious. I actually don't even like the article, just the one little phrase at the top, 'secondary abstinence'. To quote Dennis Reynolds, "I hate listening to people's dreams. It's like flipping through a stack of photographs. If I'm not in any of them, and nobody's having sex, I just... don't care." I extend that to people's pissy little problems that they don't care enough about to fix. I don't know her, I don't identify with her in any way, so it doesn't resonate with me. rjw is a man who would disagree and that's awesome because it proves she wrote something which could affect someone, which to me is the goal of writing. But I just don't care that an intelligent, attractive woman with a good job can't get laid. Why would I?