No, your responsibility is to attempt to have a meaningful discussion. I'm no fan of ACB, nor how she got there, nor the people who put her there, nor the climate that let them. I am deeply sympathetic to your health, and I agree that there's a direct line of responsibility between ACB's ruling and the very threats to your life. I'm sorry. I truly am. I understand your viewpoint 100%. I empathize with it completely. But there flavors of evil here other than "evangelical christian." Here's a script: BEN: I hate sushi. Sushi is disgusting. KB: There's definitely some gross sushi out there but I actually kinda like alaska rolls - BEN: All sushi is disgusting and anyone who defends sushi is a traitor to cuisine. KB: There are plenty of people who eat sushi who aren't terrible humans- BEN: and plenty of people that eat sea urchin which is proof positive that sushi is fundamentally disgusting! KB: Dude I'm no fan of uni and never will be but I mean, I've met people who eat uni and they aren't terrible. Terrible people eat uni, good people eat uni, plenty of people eat uni without becoming terrible people- BEN: I WAS FORCED TO EAT UNI AS A CHILD THEREFORE ALL SUSHI IS AN ABOMINATION IN THE EYES OF GOD EVERYONE: (why does KB keep engaging Ben in discussions of sushi)A theocrat, installed by a president brought to power by theocrats, is installed to push theocracy and somehow its' MY responsibility to prove that it's a religious motive that drives her to keep churches packed to the brim every sunday and legally protect plague rats who continue to do so?