a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by lil
lil  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: What's up Hubski?

    leaving up exposed vaginas and tits on my screen makes it look like I'm working.
You work in the video porn industry?




Hell  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Here is something I edited recently. (no nudity in this cut, but still nsfw most places)

humanodon  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

In the world of porn video editing, is there anyone whose editing is seen as the golden standard?

Hell  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Honestly, I think we're at a race to the bottom. With the influx of tube sites, and pay per clip sites, it's become apparent that volume (and more importantly, exploiting underused niches/kinks) trumps quality in terms of making money. It might turn around, but they don't quite make the full length porno films like they used to.

I can't say there is really a golden standard, but usually for porn, if you notice the editing in the first place, it was probably done wrong.

humanodon  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Fair enough. I guess quality isn't the first thought when it comes to satisfying base urges. I do wonder though, if any sort of porn snobbery will yet emerge or has already. I know that some sites claim to try to cater to people looking for higher quality in terms of chemistry between actors and whatever, but what I'm imagining is more along the lines of how people consider themselves film buffs and appreciators of obscure directors.

user-inactivated  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

lil  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I have a friend with lots of high tech skills who freelances or consults or whatever its called. He's been pulling in a fair amount lately updating heritage porn site technology. I guess porn gets old.

_refugee_  ·  4112 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I'm curious as well.