I don't think I have seen a study where Nash's predicted results have ever happened. Maybe we should stop using game theory?
I feel compelled to tell you that if you bothered to read Samuelson's Learning to be Imperfect you would understand that in games with noise any equilibrium is stable.
I have read it (it is very good) but I fail to understand if how that realization makes game theory useful.
... did you just have a conversation with yourself? or was this some sort of meta that I'm missing.
I was doing both sides of the game theory conversation. It is little bit of a sick joke. What it comes down to is that game theory does not need to be debunked because it has never been bunked. There is nothing empirical to back it up.
I guess I could see where he was adding on to his earlier comments, but Edit: ...you can use the edit button Edit2: ...ad nauseam.