a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by mk
mk  ·  3684 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Ask Hubski: Animal Rights and medicine - a hypothetical

True, you might decide that you don't want either; but here, in that case, you've chosen the kittens. Once you've realized that something might be done, you need to make a decision, even if the decision is to avoid making it.





b_b  ·  3684 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I don't mean that you have to decide which you'd rather. I mean it's assumed that you'll find a treatment for the disease in question. That's the leap of faith.

alpha0  ·  3683 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I think this is a critical and informative point.

b_b  ·  3683 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Right. The fact of the matter is that most research is done in vain, leading nowhere, but destroying many animals in the process. We can quibble about whether that's salient or not, but it must be considered in the calculus. There's pretty much no disease research that proceeds by the process presented in the question above. Even though it's ostensibly for kids, I think it's giving children a wrong impression to assume that there are only two outcomes to be had. The world has many shades of gray, and I think even children can appreciate some of them if given the opportunity.

mk  ·  3684 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Oh, sure. And you must also consider that you'll probably share what you learned with other people that have the same malady.