a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by MilitantNegro
MilitantNegro  ·  3681 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: What Happened in Ferguson?

Yes, but in this case, with column 1 or 2 the prosecutor was actually building a case against the proposed victim.





user-inactivated  ·  3681 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Yeah, there are good parts to this and bad -- I think in a "normal" indictment situation (no cops involved) the extended testimony, longer wait, leaving the charges up to the jury ... all very good things. In a situation like this one where a prosecutor has any number of reasons to protect the cop, all bets are unfortunately off.

I'm waiting for someone to do a comprehensive summary of the released evidence. Want to look at it but don't have time to draw the conclusions myself.

MilitantNegro  ·  3681 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    leaving the charges up to the jury

No, not a good thing...a terrible thing! A jury is a panel of regular folks. They are not trained legal practitioners. They are in NO WAY qualified to decide what the appropriate charges should be in a case.

The things you like, those are all part of a trial. That's the point of a trial, except in a trial it's all out in the open and there are two sides actually working towards a goal. In this instance the prosecutor torpedoed his own side as he had no intention of ever prosecuting a cop.

    all bets are unfortunately off

With column 1 he has less room for manoeuvrability. With column 1 he has to present his case against Darren Wilson, suggest a charge and nothing more. In column 2 he gets to present both sides of the argument and no one else is on the other side to call him on it.

user-inactivated  ·  3680 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    No, not a good thing...a terrible thing! A jury is a panel of regular folks. They are not trained legal practitioners. They are in NO WAY qualified to decide what the appropriate charges should be in a case.

I assume juries who indict people when they haven't been given a list of charges they have to conform don't pull things out of their ass. I imagine it's more like: here are the 2000 whatever possible legal charges, pick some; as opposed to, here are the three things you are allowed to charge this person with, pick some. At least I hope so. That seems to increase the options the jury has, if they are willing to put some work in.