Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
I think TED does an effective job of spreading ideas. I can understand the criticisms of the article, but I think that giving ideas a face can help to make them accessible. The benefit of TED talks is that they present information in a digestible, easy to understand format. They may narrow and simplify concepts, but they make learning sexier and more accessible. I see it as a jumping off point that can introduce listeners to a broad variety of subjects they would otherwise not have encountered.
At the end, Garber talks about how information should be a public concept. I suppose Wikipedia would perfectly encapsulate this idea. It allows people all over the world to contribute knowledge to any topic without claiming ownership of ideas. To that end, I see no reason why TED and Wikipedia can't coexist.
We were making a list of the top 10 most positively influential events in human history the other day, and although it might be too early to call, I think Wikipedia could arguably be put on that list.
I use it every day. It is an incredible font of knowledge. It is such a great thing that Jimmy Wales had a vision for it. I hope groundwork is being laid to keep it in the public sphere for a long time to come.