a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by zebra2
zebra2  ·  4618 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: 10 most challenged books of 2011
I'm not convinced that textspeak can be synonymous with illiteracy. There are tons of people that use texting shorthand just because it's good for that. While there may be some that don't know better, I don't think it makes sense to assume illiteracy through textspeak. Either way, the dialect of HF didn't become the status quo, why have that concern here?

Knowing the rules, as in knowing English grammar, is a petty task. It's especially arbitrary to need to show it through fame. And as you should know, the merits of artistic works don't ride on their author's fame or history.

You're conflating your own concerns over the sanctity of language with the mission of an artistic work. Ignoring unsavory aspects of reality is absolutely not the mission of art, so attacking the work on those grounds is pretty futile.





b_b  ·  4618 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I wasn't being literal. "Knowing the rules before you break them" is a figure of speech. It means that unless people know you're a serious person with something to say, using an alternative format just makes you look stupid. It may be an unfair critique, but it reminds me of a Banksy quote: "All artists are willing to suffer for their work. But why are so few prepared to learn to draw?" The same applies here. There is an inherent beauty to sentence structure, not just content that is completely lost in shorthand texting and messaging.

I did a quick academic literature search for how IM affects literature. Interesting results. It appears that lots of IM and texting give kids more confidence in writing, increases their vocabulary and (surprisingly) spelling skills, but that it decreases reading comprehension and the ability to distinguish non-standard from standard English. Mixed results, it seems.