a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by b_b

Yes, I'm sure the rule was put in place for what seemed like a good reason, but leads to some absurd results. I learned about it from a story on On the Media, where they were talking about a law professor who tried to get Wikipedia to fix an article using the law itself, but was denied. For whatever reason, my work blocks On the Media's website, so I can't link, but its worth searching if you have a few minutes.





NotPhil  ·  4483 days ago  ·  link  ·  

The Professor Versus Wikipedia

Apparently, the secondary sources rule is only for perceived credibility. They want everyone to be able to have access to the sources used, and they assume primary sources will be unaccessible from the Web.

thundara  ·  4483 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Because everyone has the money to drop $100 on a history textbook in a citation?... That seems like a rather weak claim for them to make.