this is a fairly uncommon viewpoint for American "libertarians"
While the perspective is interesting, I wonder about his disdain for "the never-ending game of playing business and labor off against one another" and how he would expect this to change in a libertarian society. It seems like as long as you have unskilled creation of goods you're going to have a separation between worker and employer.
He's speaking in the context of state interference with the market. "Playing business and labor off against one another" is used to generate public support for state interference. In a theoretical pure capitalist market, state interference would be minimal beyond an overarching protection of the sustaining institutions of the market. Conflicts between workers and employers would obviously continue, but the state would be expected to neither intervene nor seek advantage. (IMO this expectation is unrealistic.) As to the "separation between worker and employer", that's really dependent upon ownership more than anything else. A coöp, for example, would not have such a separation, because the workers are the owners.
Right- means of production in the hands of the laborers, something about a spectre in Europe... Pretty sure I've heard this before. ;) I think the only situation in which that sort of hands-off, laissez-faire policy has been applied is in South America during it's Friedman days. University of Chicago boys and all of that "death and poverty" stuff.
It's uncommon, but I'm happy that a libertarian agrees that right to work is wrong. It seems to be legislation for the purpose of undermining collective bargaining for workers and supporting corporate control.