a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by user-inactivated
user-inactivated  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Follow up to "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of C"

Why forth?





briandmyers  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I've only read a little about it but it seems very object oriented, and a bit like Lisp for hardware. A different approach but a big learning curve.

user-inactivated  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·  

What I don't get is how to structure your programs in forth. In C, it's natural with control flow and functions, but in forth, everything's a function, so it can all be written in one line...

user-inactivated  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·  

hmmm, didn't know it was an oop, thought it was just functional composition and nothing else.

briandmyers  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Yes, exactly. As I said I only know a little about it, but it seems like you use Forth to design a language which matches (and controls) your machine. As you sometimes use Lisp to build other languages.

user-inactivated  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·  

but how would that make it oop? that would just mean that it sorta enables metaprogramming.

briandmyers  ·  4351 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Now that you mention it, I think I've gotten my wires cross about the object-orientation angle; I think i was thinking of Smalltalk. It's another language that I've also thought would be interesting to learn, sometime. I really don't know a lot about either of them, though.