Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
I was pointing out that they were toeing the middle line of encouraging teachers to instruct in a language the students were familiar with while also helping them to practice "business English." I don't have an argument about the ethics of treating that as the superior language to be taught, but you're welcome to inform me more on the matter.
I'm saying that a conscious choice was being made to teach a "language" that, by anyone's judgement, is a vernacular at best. And, as vernaculars are not taught at any other school in the US, the choice to do so was a flagrantly active choice. It in no way reflects "toeing the line."