Schekman said pressure to publish in "luxury" journals encouraged researchers to cut corners and pursue trendy fields of science instead of doing more important work. The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash.
b_b and mk, my two science pals, is this an accurate statement in your views?
I think so. They do often contain interesting science, but the prestige has colored the process and motivations. TBH there isn't even much need for journals anymore. Everything could be put through peer-review, and then hosted online by an international consortium.
Yes, that's pretty much it. Top-tier journals are very interested in a high number of citations for their articles. That's how they achieve a high "Impact Factor" which has become the measure of a journal's influence. They publish interesting and significant science, but favor hot topics over less popular areas of research. Journals are outdated, and they are dying. Their purpose was distribution, and currently, they actually hinder it more than they aid it.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ All manuscripts with NIH funding must be open access within a period, which I think is 6 months. For example, you'll see a link in the top right that says Free in PMC, where you can get a free copy. You can create an account, and get alerts of new articles based on keywords, etc. PLOSOne is a free multidisciplinary journal that is Open Access. A lot of very good research appears in this journal. PLOS has several journals, all of which are open access (free online).