His points seem more than reasonable. You seem like an authoritarian apologist who doesn't give a shit that your previous "points" were rebutted and will continuously find reasons that five cops need to put an innocent young boy in handcuffs. Why would he want to keep engaging with you? You might not be a cop/authority ass kiss, you also might be a troll.
i just don't get how anyone can believe that. A serious response like that usually has serious reasons behind it, and that is what is actually reasonable to assume. Without clear evidence of racism (like slurs), it's not logical to blame the reaction on racism with the details we know. What was rebutted? That the device was sketchy? That he was told not to show it to others and he ignored that? All I've maintained is that the whole situation seems very strange and that there's no way to know whether the reaction was justified given the details that have come out.His points seem more than reasonable.
You seem like an authoritarian apologist who doesn't give a shit that your previous "points" were rebutted