a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by dbingham
I don't think it has anything to do with him being centrist or "leaning" to the right. He's a progressive for sure. But he can only get done that which congress allows. And congress has been pretty damned obstructive.

I would say Obama is a pragmatic progressive. If you don't see him reaching for more, it's because he knows there's no way in hell he's gonna get it yet. So he reaches for less, things he thinks he can get. And then once he gets them, looks for ways to make the next step. He plays a very long chess game. We're criticizing him for sacrificing a bunch of pieces half way through. I'm still willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and see what the end game looks like.





thenewgreen  ·  4731 days ago  ·  link  ·  
Didn't Clinton have a republican congress to deal with too? Was he also seen as being too much of an appeaser while in office and as having no back bone or was he seen as a unifier? Sincere question.
dbingham  ·  4731 days ago  ·  link  ·  
Clinton instituted Don't Ask, Don't Tell, oversaw the repeal of Glass-Steagal, and failed to completely make any progress on Health Care. He was, also, impeached by his Republican opponents.

And that was all with a Republican opposition that was not nearly so obstructionist, experienced, insane or entrenched as the one Obama faces today. In Clinton's day, Fox News had not yet become the bastion of right wing propaganda that it is today, there were some campaign finance laws in place, Republicans had not yet perfected their use of the filibuster to completely shutdown the government and there was no Tea Party.

thenewgreen  ·  4730 days ago  ·  link  ·  
Very valid, particularly the Tea Party and the Fox News points. It's definitely a different environment. I think it's unprecedented to have either of the party say that they essentially "hope the president fails" in general terms.