Russia provided NK with the technology and expertise to build their first nuclear reactors in the 1950's, and the relationship has been on-going since then - with some very tough times around Yeltsin - continuing through the Sochi Olympics and today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea%E2%80%93Russia_relations Despite NK being a black-listed pariah for every other country in the world, Russia decides to continue to do business with NK. As far as Chechnya goes, the Russian army flattened Grozny, and have been camped out in the capital since 1999, basically claiming ownership of the country. So Chechnya is now in a "rebellion" instead of in a "war". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chechen%E2%80%93Russian_conflict#Chechen_Wars Who is on that list? North Korea, I presume, but who else? I'm thinking of not a literal "List of Bad Guys" list. More of a colloquial, "Why do these few countries keep doing things to jack up the world for the rest of us?" kind of list. It happens like this; A whole coalition of countries comes to an agreement of the logical way to deal with some issue, and you can always be sure that Russia, North Korea, China (sometimes), and some small African nation will vote against the plan. That's what I mean by "shit list"... the countries who routinely mess things up, just because they can. Not because they have an actual point to make, or clear alternative course of action proposed. Just because they want to be pig-headed. What are the main social, technological and/or cultural differences between "you" (who is that, by the way?) and Russia that you can note? By "the rest of us" I mean the group of first world nations. Russia is a puzzlement because they are the last shining example of people who can get things into space, reliably, regularly, and for a reasonable price. But in nearly every other regard, Russia's products are just terrible quality. Cars, military tech, any tech at all really, planes, national air carriers, trains, buses, etc. Why is it that a country that has such a reliable and effective space program cannot create a basic car? Why is it that a country with some amazing higher education institutions, and some of the most brilliant minds in history, can't LEAD in some world-changing sector? Why do Russian minds find more success outside of Russia than they do inside? (Just rhetorical questions here...) Is that a random number, or are you basing it on some sort of real-life info (like the amount of the real oppositionist members of the government or something)? I just am referencing the Stalist purges of history. But, if you look back on changes in the Kremlin over the last 30 years, what generally happens is that a charismatic leader leaves office for some reason, and a HUGE number of people are suddenly out of work at the Kremlin, and a whole new group of people - "friends" of the new leader - are suddenly filling those seats. The government in Russia seems to me to be run more on cronyism than on any sort of formal rules. So when one leader goes, there is a huge amount of turnover and turmoil as the new leader kicks out a bunch of people he doesn't like, and brings in his cousins and nephews and other cronies. You are very welcome! But I think there is nothing here to be depressed by. Look at is this way: Why am I frustrated with Russia? Because I think it is capable of SO MUCH MORE! To me, Russia is this amazing bundle of potential that keeps tripping over its own shoelaces. But tying shoes is EASY once you know how. And at some point Russia is going to get it's shoes tied right, and it is going to be a POWERHOUSE of innovation and progress on par with America and China and Europe. You've got the resources. You've got the brains. You've got the pride. You clearly have the technical prowess to keep up with anybody. All that holds Russia back is Russia sabotaging itself with self-defeating exceptionalism. It seems that Russia's only view of itself is in opposition to somebody else. Once Russia figures out that it doesn't need to use anybody else's measuring stick, I think Russia will be an AMAZING asset to the world... rather than the grumpy anti-social kid sitting in the corner glowering at everyone else having so much fun. You mention North Korea as among the only ones wanting to deal with Putin. What's that about?
> Is it really worth it to be put on the worldwide Shit List?
>The rest of us are advancing, living in the 21st century, and moving forward
> and the following purge kills off 93% of the people in office
> Thank you for sharing your perspective. This has been... depressing, but enlightening.
That is of utmost surprise to me, and it's terrible. We don't see anything about it on the news - not a single word. What about the US? The country won the space race - wouldn't they still be a shining example of space travel and engineering? That is a good non-rhetorical question, as well. My uneducated theory is that the USSR has put so much effort into overcoming the US in the space race that all of the engineering efforts were put into it, which may have left other industries weakened. Now that space travel is almost the only thing Russia excels at, people don't want to let go of it to not lose face even more. Our car manufacturing is basically an artifact from the USSR and hasn't been improved upon much since. It's depressing to realize in just how big of a pit the country's in, but - I see your point. There's great potential here, certainly, and we better start working on it if we want our country to regain it's superpower status. My small contribution is making our faculty - the Foreign Languages - let us pick any language to learn as our second foreign (right now, the choice is assigned to the whole group, and there's a definite schism among the groups that have to pick). Hopefully, I will succeed and we shall enjoy the benefits of free will in a university still led by the Soviet-minded people. If not, there will be a small rebellion: let us remind them of the point of higher education. Why do you say that? The Soviet Union lost the Cold War exactly because it didn't have the technology to keep up with the West. Can you elaborate on that? Again, thank you for sharing. Your point of view is invaluable in understanding Russia.Russia provided NK with the technology and expertise to build their first nuclear reactors in the 1950's, and the relationship has been on-going since then
Russia is a puzzlement because they are the last shining example of people who can get things into space, reliably, regularly, and for a reasonable price.
Why is it that a country that has such a reliable and effective space program cannot create a basic car?
But I think there is nothing here to be depressed by.
You clearly have the technical prowess to keep up with anybody.
Russia sabotaging itself with self-defeating exceptionalism
What about the US? The country won the space race - wouldn't they still be a shining example of space travel and engineering? Well, the US used to have a space program. But a bunch of short-sighted dickwads ended that. Russia is the only reason the International Space Station is still flying. There is nobody who can get equipment to/from the ISS except Russia. (Except SpaceX, who docked the Dragon with the ISS last year. And, in fact, a high school friend of mine is the PILOT of the Dragon!! Woo!!) The future of the US space program is firmly in the hands of the private sector. Real space is only 200 miles away, but goddamn it's hard to get there! But the Russians? They go there ALL THE FUCKING TIME. No other nation does that. Be proud. That is a good non-rhetorical question, as well. My uneducated theory is that the USSR has put so much effort into overcoming the US in the space race that all of the engineering efforts were put into it, which may have left other industries weakened. Actually, I think the answer is pretty easy. I used to work at NASA, and one of the departments I worked with was specifically tasked with taking the innovations that NASA had developed, and giving them to companies in the private sector to commercialize. NASA is publicly funded with our tax dollars. So the public wants to see the stuff NASA invents released to the public in useful ways. Here are a bunch of examples. This may the be core problem with Russia's space program... is there is no concerted effort to move that technology to the private sector. Because you guys have all the skills and knowledge... but just aren't transferring it well to others. In the big scope of things, that is a small problem to solve. So that's part of why I think Russia has so much untapped potential. That's true. But all of that knowledge and skill resides in people's heads. And those people need to be able to find capital, start a business, and find a market for the products they make with their good ideas. And that's a tough thing to find in Russia today, while it is easy to find in the US. Why do you say that? The Soviet Union lost the Cold War exactly because it didn't have the technology to keep up with the West. Not as I understand it. We basically bankrupted you. We didn't win due to superior technical prowess, we won because you ran out of money first. (But it was very close.) Can you elaborate on that? It's what I was saying before, about Russia always taking sides with international pariah states, instead of working hand-in-hand with the first world nations to try and make the entire world a better place. Russia always seems to feel like they need to partner up with the underdog, the international bad guy. And that definitely makes it hard for anyone to work with Russia in any other context - business, trade, etc. Take Syria, for example. Everyone got together and agreed that Assad is a total asshole douchewaffle, who runs a psychotic regime of repression, torture, and hate. Then ISIS shows up, and says that they are creating the second coming of a Muslim caliphate by drawing the western powers into a ground war in their "holy land", as prophesied in their scriptures. And they go on a crusade of horror and torture to try and draw the wester powers into a ground war. So the world's powers get together and say, "We're not gonna fall for that. We can starve them out. We can cut off their oil, money, food, etc, and lay an economic siege. They will eventually wither away." So everyone gets on board, and ISIS continues to do stupid shit to try and provoke these nations to put boots on the ground, but everybody stands firm. ISIS wavers. They almost fall apart at the seams. They are within about 3 months of falling apart and dying in isolation. Then Russia breaks ranks with the rest of the world and goes full-out war on Syria. Thereby reinforcing ISIS's basic premise, driving up their recruitment to all time highs, and starting the next Afghanistan. Not only do they empower ISIS by fulfilling ISIS's every wish, Russia also decides to be a real dick about it, and enthusiastically support the psychotic despot Assad!! So not only are they happy to completely fuck the world into a global world war in the middle east, they decide to back the absolute worst human being on the planet... a guy who can't even get support inside his own country!! THAT is the "Russian exceptionalism" I am talking about. Thank YOU man!! This is very interesting for me, as well. Your viewpoint as a regular person inside of Russia looking out, is fascinating for me. > Russia is a puzzlement because they are the last shining example of people who can get things into space, reliably, regularly, and for a reasonable price.
> Why is it that a country that has such a reliable and effective space program cannot create a basic car?
My uneducated theory is that the USSR has put so much effort into overcoming the US in the space race that all of the engineering efforts were put into it, which may have left other industries weakened.
> You clearly have the technical prowess to keep up with anybody.
> Russia sabotaging itself with self-defeating exceptionalism
Again, thank you for sharing. Your point of view is invaluable in understanding Russia.
Thank you for sharing such an enlightening point of view, and apologies for taking so long to reply. Speaking of Russian exceptionalism... I recently read an open letter to Brazil from Mark Manson, a blogger who's spent four years there, being from the US himself. In that letter, he outlines the cause and effect of a screwed and skewed mentality that drives the country's problems. What struck me is how it almost precisely corresponds with what I've been seeing inside Russia. We don't have all the problems Brazil has and vice versa, but the underlying cause - human selfishness being acceptable on the cultural level - is spot-on towards Russia as much as it may be towards Brazil (with the culture of which I'm not familiar in any good way). If you're interested in what it looks like, read the letter and imagine men and women much paler with less Sun over their heads.
I've been talking to this Russian guy in the Hostel and he has a pretty interesting theory. He says foreign relations and expectations of Russia would be better if only Russians looked more different than Europeans (like asian or black or something). His theory is that people don't realize how different Russian culture is from european and that people tend to forget because Russians are white. Expectations are thus set differently and people are less sensitive to cultural difference which just paints the Russians as being "crazy"instead of different. He rambled quite a lot about Russia, he has some interesting perspectives. You talk about Tsarist ideals but he compared Russia to Byzantine. You're either a slave, manager or slave owner in Russia. Which honestly s not too far off the truth considering Russia was the only place to enslave their own people (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom_in_Russia) less than 150 years ago.
In a book by Thomas Mann ( The magic mountain ) the narrator become obsessed with a woman. The narrator keep on talking on how she has those Russian eyes and features. I think it's something somewhat Asian looking: Slightly slanting black eyes. A friend of mine of Russian ascend has them. On other side of thing, I kind of feel the US has that type of male with wide solid jaws that seems so prevalent in US compares to the rest of the world. The average of people face by country might prove me wrong.
Nonsense. Why are Germans and the French considered so vastly different, then? They're both white people, but their culture is obviously and vastly different to anyone, even the most uneducated. People of France have baguette, people of German have Pretzeln; France has wine, Germany (and the mostly-German, culturally, countries) has beer; France has relaxed attitude towards work while Germans are workaholics. I mean, even if we go by solely stereotypes, it doesn't make any sense, - so maybe it's Russia, after all, that is to blame.He says foreign relations and expectations of Russia would be better if only Russians looked more different than Europeans (like asian or black or something)
Are they? I think you'd be hard-pressed to get someone from Malaysia to think of big differences. Go back a few hundred years (about 1200), and they're the same people! Those things you listed, I could list them for every Bundesland, there's always a difference, but those differences are minuscule in comparison to Russia, a country that has a very different history and origins. While France and Germany have always been in close contact with each other, it wasn't until maybe the 17th century that western europe really became aware of Russia as something to deal with. Then there's the fact that the early conflicts were mainly against the khanates of the steppe, culminating in the Golden Horde's rule, which lasted about 300 years. At that time, Germany and France were mainly occupied with infighting (in the case of proto-Germany) or the fight against muslims. The two countries are inextricably linked in their history. Just look at how the frech and german kings circled each other in the matter of the Italian city states. And that thread winds through, Russia just dealt with very different things historically (up until the Napoleonic wars). And history forms culture. And common history fosters an understanding you don't have with completely new aquaintances.Why are Germans and the French considered so vastly different, then?
Wouldn't it be reasonable to assume every culture to be different, therefore? If the "white West" sees within themselves the difference (do dare call a US person not so different from a German), why stop there for Russia specifically? I'd argue that it's Russia's appearance that makes other countries turn away and not investigate further. Like that kid in your class whom no one talks to because he's "weird". And wouldn't it be even more reasonable to assume such a vast difference for a country with such a different history? No, I'm not buying the physical appearance argument.Those things you listed, I could list them for every Bundesland, there's always a difference, but those differences are minuscule in comparison to Russia, a country that has a very different history and origins.
I wonder where in Russia he is from? It makes a BIG difference. The "Russians" we Westerners think of are from the Russia where the vast majority of Russians live: a rough triangle with points at St Petersburg, Moscow, and Kiev. Go further south or east and "Russians" are VERY different, physically, mentally, and culturally. The Byzantine nature of the Russian southeast through the length of the Silk Road is readily apparent, even today. But the look/culture/style of those "Russians" are not what we Westerners would consider "Russian" at all.
Berobijian from what I heard was ussrs attempt the exile Jews to Siberia more diplomatically than sending them to the gulag. One of my grandfather had "Jew" as his nationallity in his passport (he was born in ukraine) and I remember getting into countless debates about the question back in high school. Here in Canada you can be Israeli, being a Jew is not a nationality . Brings back some memories... I don't really know where I was going with this comment anymore