Here's your title, 21 days ago, Ben: "ACB is ALREADY enforcing christian morality over the rest of us" (emphasis yours) What you wrote three weeks ago was untrue. If you wrote it today it would still be untrue: what ACB is doing is asserting that religious freedom trumps safety. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to argue how ACB's position represents "christian morality" particularly when the plaintiffs in the case were "Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Agudath Israel of America." You might also want to take a flyer at the fact that Amy Coney Barrett rejects the Ninety Five Theses, so whatever version of "Christian" she represents predates your particularly-loathed version of charismatic evangelical Christianity by a good 400 years. In ACB's universe the Anglicans are heretics. Religiously speaking she's closer to the Copts than to your family. Doesn't mean she isn't a religious conservative. Does mean that your sloppy imprecision undermines your arguments, which only those of us who love you are even humoring at this point.
They are all plague rats. They all spread disease willfully. The exact flavor doesn't matter because they act as one political entity. This is the stalling of dialogue that I've referred to before. A theocrat, installed by a president brought to power by theocrats, is installed to push theocracy and somehow its' MY responsibility to prove that it's a religious motive that drives her to keep churches packed to the brim every sunday and legally protect plague rats who continue to do so? WE ALL USE THE SAME HOSPITALS. I HAVE BEEN DENIED MEDICAL CARE THAT I DESPERATELY NEED BECAUSE THE FACILITIES THAT I NEED ARE EITHER SHUT DOWN DUE TO COVID OR OVERBURDENED. THIS IS DIRECTLY DESTROYING WHAT REMAINS OF MY HEALTH. Fuck this.
No, your responsibility is to attempt to have a meaningful discussion. I'm no fan of ACB, nor how she got there, nor the people who put her there, nor the climate that let them. I am deeply sympathetic to your health, and I agree that there's a direct line of responsibility between ACB's ruling and the very threats to your life. I'm sorry. I truly am. I understand your viewpoint 100%. I empathize with it completely. But there flavors of evil here other than "evangelical christian." Here's a script: BEN: I hate sushi. Sushi is disgusting. KB: There's definitely some gross sushi out there but I actually kinda like alaska rolls - BEN: All sushi is disgusting and anyone who defends sushi is a traitor to cuisine. KB: There are plenty of people who eat sushi who aren't terrible humans- BEN: and plenty of people that eat sea urchin which is proof positive that sushi is fundamentally disgusting! KB: Dude I'm no fan of uni and never will be but I mean, I've met people who eat uni and they aren't terrible. Terrible people eat uni, good people eat uni, plenty of people eat uni without becoming terrible people- BEN: I WAS FORCED TO EAT UNI AS A CHILD THEREFORE ALL SUSHI IS AN ABOMINATION IN THE EYES OF GOD EVERYONE: (why does KB keep engaging Ben in discussions of sushi)A theocrat, installed by a president brought to power by theocrats, is installed to push theocracy and somehow its' MY responsibility to prove that it's a religious motive that drives her to keep churches packed to the brim every sunday and legally protect plague rats who continue to do so?