Didja see the news today? Iran says they have a Scan Eagle. Jane's says "Scan Eagles are usually ship-launched." US Navy says "we haven't lost any Scan Eagles." Everyone looks over at the CIA, which quietly shuffles its feet and heads for the door...
at a rate of one per year...
Oh, the Beast of Kandahar is something totally different. That one warms the cockles of my heart on so many levels. There was a great write-up on how they pulled it off but I couldn't find it in half an hour of searching last night. I might look again if there's interest.
Hubski search!: drone + iran Moon of Alabama, courtesy of gibson (wondering why he got a Hubski email). What the Iranians seem to have done is to take over the drone's line-of-sight control. This after electronically disrupting its satellite link. Disrupting the satellite link alone would not be enough as the drone would then have followed some preprogrammed action like simply flying back to where it came from. With the line-of-sight control active a satellite link disruption would not lead to a preprogrammed abort. We can reasonably assume that the Iranians have some station near Kandahar Airport that is listening to all military radio traffic there. They had four years to analyze the radio signaling between the ground operator and such drones. Even if that control signal is encrypted pattern recognition during many flights over four years would have given them enough information to break the code.When the drone is in the air it is controlled via a satellite link from a remote operating station. But during start and landing the drone is piloted via line-of-sight radio by an operator near the start or landing field. This is necessary because the remote satellite link has a delay of several hundred milliseconds which is just too much latency to correct wind sheer and other problems during takeoff and landing.