I've read the comments of a couple posts where the poster said something that only made sense if I knew it was the poster saying it, and so I had to go back and check the poster's username. Similar to reddit, I think a highlight over the poster's username would make for a better comment reading experience.
Maybe an option to highlight the names of people you follow with the ability to change the color of the highlight for different users. Maybe another coloring option for new posts since you last visited? I think it would help sort users you are familiar with and be able to search for new people to follow. It might be a little to overbearing and hard to sort though. But I think a highlighting feature would be nice.
If you save a post it sends you a notification every time someone leaves a new comment, even if it's not a reply to you. I'm not sure how you use your save feature though; some people might not wish to save a post they are interested in following for only a day or so.
You can unsave a post any time you wish and the comment notification feature can be turned off if you are not interested in the comments. This is not on a per post basis tough. You either receive notifications or you don't.
Perhaps a 'subscribe to post' feature is in order, as another option for those who opt not to receive notifications?
It might sound weird, but I think that the all or nothing approach mk is taking here is actually a natural way to do this for Hubski. Hubski is a place for thoughtful discussions, so the article is not the main thing to have quick access to. The discussion is. And you either want to keep up to date with the discussion or you don't. If this isn't what you expect of a save function, you can turn the notifications off and you have a save function which only saves the articles and not so much the discussions that follow. This is my interpretation of the current save function, but only mk knows why he did what he did.
After a couple of days, the asterisk wasn't really working for me. It was there, but it didn't serve much of a purpose. I like to be sure that every additional element is a obvious positive, and it didn't really feel like a strong one. I'm not closing the book on it, but I do feel that it needs to be justified in light of the negative mentioned by solid3joe. We are actually brainstorming a different commenting affinity measure atm.