a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by thenewgreen
thenewgreen  ·  4331 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Whole Foods will label GMO food

The site they link to warns of the dangers but never says what they are. Then, if you dial in to a PDF buried on the site it finally stated this:

    Peer-reviewed studies have found harmful effects on the health of laboratory and livestock animals fed GMOs. Effects include toxic and allergenic effects and altered nutritional value. u Most animal feeding studies on GMOs have only been short-term or medium-term in length. What is needed are long-term and multi-generational studies on GMOs to see if the worrying changes commonly reported in short- and medium-term studies develop into serious disease. Such studies are not required by government regulators. u Industry and regulators dismiss findings of harm in animal feeding trials on GMOs by claiming they are “not biologically significant” or “not biologically relevant” – scientifically meaningless terms that have not been properly defined. u No GM nutritionally enhanced (biofortified) foods are available on the market. In contrast, conventional plant breeding has successfully and safely produced many biofortified foods. u The most-hyped GM nutritionally enhanced food, Golden Rice, aimed at combating vitamin A deficiency, has wasted millions in development funds – yet has not been proven safe to eat and is still not ready for the market. Meanwhile, proven and inexpensive solutions to vitamin A deficiency are available and only need proper funding to be more widely applied. u Conventional plant breeding has successfully and safely produced many biofortified foods.
-allergy and altered nutritional value? That's all you've got? I can see wanting more research in to the effects, but in the absence of that research, making it appear to be evil just seems wrong. Brilliant marketing by the non GMO people. My guess is that there are a lot of hungry people in this world that could care less about GMO.




user-inactivated  ·  4331 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Right. There is no scientific evidence that GMOs are harmful or dangerous. They're just the future, and some people have a problem with that. The bottom line, luckily, is GMOs aren't going anywhere in the places they're needed most -- Green Revolution third-world countries, etc.

hugitout  ·  4330 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Actually Kenya recently banned GMO foods. Other countries in Africa may follow suit. The reasons given by the Kenyan authorities are pretty shoddy. They are banning them until it is proven that they are not harmful. Guilty until proven innocent. http://allafrica.com/stories/201211301197.html

NotPhil  ·  4330 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    They are banning them until it is proven that they are not harmful.

It's entirely sensible to practice the precautionary principle for something human lives are dependent on.

thenewgreen  ·  4330 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I have nothing against precaution and to the extent it's feasible, consumers should know what they're buying. But this announcement coincides a little too neatly with the release of the CEO's book "Conscientious Capitalism". The below photo was take. By me tonight at our local whole foods.

b_b  ·  4330 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Ha! This from a guy who has been accused of stock price manipulation and other shady dealings. The only thing this DB is conscious of is making money. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but what a fuckin' phony.

user-inactivated  ·  4330 days ago  ·  link  ·  

GMOs have been used world-wide and they've also been proven safe for consumption.

hugitout  ·  4330 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Thats true, and ultimately who knows? Maybe this will be seen as brilliant legislation ahead of its time. It just seems to be done prematurely. Human lives are also dependant on the availability of food, and there are places where without GMO's demand would quickly outpace supply.