- There’s a lot of homeless club music right now, which is really weird to see. There are a lot of scenes and networks that get promoted but there isn’t a place where it exists. That’s why Berghain’s such a huge brand name—it’s had residents who have helped to manufacture and sharpen a very specific sound and kind of techno. I think as residencies become less and less the norm, club music becomes more theoretical. It’s like people could dance to this somewhere. This might go off in a club somewhere, I don’t know what club, because I don’t play anywhere. There’s a lot of that. Music has always been made for the space it was supposed to be in. Madrigals and early choral music, that was made for big churches which had a lot of reverb, so it was meant to work with reverb. So that’s still a problem that’s being worked out in club music. Because you have club music that’s made in a lot of different spaces that travels and goes everywhere, even though it’s not sonically supposed to work in the places that it ends up being played.
Have a fever right now and this is rocking my world. Perfect fever tunes.
There's one sure-fire way to cure a fever.... (no, not cowbell) well, maybe cowbell, but definitely going in to your studio and recording a fever inspired tune. Go make some music. Also, push fluids.
Interesting stuff, but I don't know if I could take a whole night of it. I've started thinking that club music is really where the cutting edge of music is, and probably has been for quite a while. Not that there's nothing happening in other genres, but I frankly haven't heard any rock since... the 90s, or maybe early 2000s that I didn't feel like was just kind of a stylistic rehash. I'm not saying I haven't heard good stuff, but it's never really revolutionary. Rock has been explored from every angle, can it go anywhere else? In clubs, especially since I moved to England, I've heard some really crazy shit. Stuff that you would never hear on the radio, which makes me feel like I'm living in the future. Not necessarily stuff I'd listen to at home, but it's exciting when you're having a night out, and you feel like the music is just challenging you to live up to its craziness. You could argue that it's fuelled by drugs, but one of the most interesting rock periods (psychedelia) was as well, so I don't necessarily view that as a bad thing.
Frankly, I haven't written down the names of anything. As I said, it's usually stuff I wouldn't necessarily listen to at home, but which is cool when I'm dancing my ass off.
> I've started thinking that club music is really where the cutting edge of music is ... no. Club music is pretty much uniformly simple musically. I have heard all of two electronic dance albums that did anything at all interesting with the music, the rest are just fucking around with synths. "Heeyyyy, check it out! I can make the bass wobble!" is not cutting edge. Of course I'm not going to stand here and say "nothing in the entire genre is worth listening to" because that would obviously be absurd. So here's an autocounterexample: Caravan Palace. Those guys are genuinely cutting edge. Their music is super theoretically complicated in ways I don't see many other artists doing. They do this thing with diminished chords to make modulations that shouldnt make sense work. And wonderful melodies. That's breaking ground. But calling caravan palace edm is a stretch: they're a nine person swing band that plays with a synthesizer! It should be said that there isn't much of a "cutting edge" to be on musically. We figured it all out already, for the most part. That's why John Cage got famous: weird, experimental pieces were the only thing left untouched by composers over the last half millennium. So no matter who you are or what you do musically, chances are pretty darn good you're rehashing old ideas. "But wait!" You claim, "that can't be right. Edm requires computers to make, it hasn't been around for long at all! How can it have been done before?" Ah. But there's no difference between a c# played by a computer and a c# played by a violin. The theory is the same, all the computer does is let you play around with timbre. Which opens no new doors theoretically. Edm is exactly as original and cutting edge as nearly all the other music out there: not at all. I personally predict edm will be remembered like disco.
You seem to think that music begins and ends with tones. I find that to be a reductionist and immature view of the matter. It's kind of like saying that it doesn't matter if it's Michelangelo or your 2 year old son that draws a lady. They're both ladies, it doesn't matter if one is painted with nuance and depth, while the other is a stick figure. Why don't you go and listen to MIDI arrangements of classical music, if you think timbre is so unimportant? You're sounding like a 16 year old that just learned about musical theory. You want the world to be simple, but it is not.
Innovation in timbre sounds oxymoronic to me. That doesn't mean timbre is unimportant or irrelevant to the music, it means claiming music is "breaking new ground" because of its timbre is laughable. There's no logic to it. There's no such thing as an objectively superior or inferior timbre. No such thing as a more complicated timbre. No such thing as an innovative timbre. Just different timbres and people's subjective opinions of them. Because you like electronic does not make it more innovative or cutting edge.