I suppose I should have looked at the domain before following the link. This is very red pill. I like how the guy said his wife's job was to take care of the baby so he shouldn't ever have to wake up for night feedings. He sounds just like my ex-husband. I'm sure he would've loved a job where he needed to work all day and night and was on call permanently with a new call every 2-4 hours, including through the night, without ever being able to pass the responsibility on to a partner to finally catch a little rest during the weekend. I'm really surprised more women don't have postpartum depression with how many are expected to bear the full brunt of raising a child without support. Of course the problem here isn't lack of support, she was totally just gleefully robbing him of all his wealth while being selfish and uncaring. There's no way all of this behavior was a cry for help, just shove a new car in her face and everything will be fine. Oh, that didn't save the marriage? Well somehow it is still evidence that women have the maturity of a teenager and just want a provider to give them shiny things.
To be fair, if one person is going to be supplying all of the monetary gain and supporting the family in that regard, is it not only fair that the other support the family in the opposite regard? I'm not saying men and women can't both work and be homemakers at the same time and I don't claim to know his exact story aside from what was told. We don't really knew if she wanted to work a job and bring home some bacon or if she wanted to stay at home. If she doesn't want to work a job and wants to stay at home I believe that IS her job and at that point why should he get up and do it? At that point it is her job as he is providing everything else but the home making part of life. This would be the same if the man wanted to stay home and the woman was the primary provider as well. Again to reiterate; I do not believe this to be the only model for a household. Do not take it as bigotry as the same should be held true whether a man is the primary provider or the female. Edit: additional content Different people are looking for different things in their relationship. If you are looking to be the sole provider and want a stay at home spouse to raise the kids that is something that should be discussed between you before you have kids/getmarried or w/e you are into.
He was supporting her by working his ass off and allowing her to spend time with their child (and no, being a stay-at-home mom is not worse than having a real job). Her behaviour was selfish and exploitative, and the end of the story makes this clear: she showed zero appreciation for all he had done for her. I feel sorry for your ex-husband, having to deal with your ungrateful ass for who knows how many years. Hopefully he's in a better place now. Remember guys: never, ever, ever marry.
You clearly get it. Though I'm not sure I agree with never marrying period. Tough call there.
So, that caught my attention. This went from unadulterated misogyny, to Nietzscheanism. I've been watching through Andromeda. In the show, there's a genetically modified race of superhumans called 'Nietzcheans.' They follow Nietzche's philosophy religiously. Humans exist for their own ends, and to reproduce. Every male (and female) is wholly individualistic, Randian, and selfish—but also strongly familial, because their children are their genetic legacy. This article feels like that, at the end. At first glance, red pillers seem simply misogynist, but I wonder if they're really closer to Nietzchean.Now, this is the part you men probably weren’t expecting. The reality is, men are also replaceable. The trick is to make a woman feel like you are irreplaceable.
Just remember, men. Work to improve yourself at all times, establish an alpha presence in your relationships, and know that any woman can replaced at any time.
Link for those who want to read this without going to the site: https://web.archive.org/web/20150714060445/http://masculineempire.com/all-women-are-replaceable/
Jesus H. Christ, I think this whole attitude biggest problem for men who turn to MRA/masculinity-focused self-help: that there's one way of acting and presenting yourself that is successful; and that this particular way is naturally, biologically ingrained in humanity so therefore it must be right. The reason you've experienced pain in relationships is because you aren't physically chiseled, emotionally cold and blunt, stubborn, and salaried enough to please any real (read: traditionalist/conservative) woman (who are creatures governed by "the same fundamental biological impulses, physical traits, electro-chemical reactions, and synaptic firings"). But if you have enough of those things, real women will be irresistibly attracted to you and you'll have them wrapped around your finger. Constant blowjobs after you return from hanging out with your bros every night. Let her experience your alpha status
This one is too far out for me to even touch. I feel like his point was to help men understand that staying in a toxic relationship is bad and you can do better but wow....
It sounds like this guy went through a toxic and destructive relationship and is applying this to all women. Sure women are replaceable and aren't unique, but then again, so are men. While the author did say this he made it clear to emphasize this shortcoming on women instead of men creating the perception that it was women who severely lacked in this regard.