I'm curious what Hubskiers know about the concept of Indigo children and if there are any that believe they were an Indigo child.
If so, what are your experiences on that?
What else does Hubski think about Chrystal children, Rainbow children, and other paranormally inclined terms?
Because (in my experience) no one ever declares themselves an "indigo child." They are declared an "indigo child" by their mother. Convinced that their child is somehow special, they poke and prod a few medical professionals in vain, only to be told that no, their kid is actually quite normal. Thus they turn to sympathetic ears on the Internet who inform them that their child actually has an odd constellation of supernatural powers and does indeed herald the next step of human evolution. These traits are usually a blend of "Children of the Damned", "Witch Mountain" and "Tomorrow People" which all emphasize the inability of society to deal with the messianic powers of the youth. Fundamentally, women determine that their kids are "indigo children" because it's not that they're a little odd, it's not that they can't figure out how to discipline them, it's not that they can't figure out strategies to get their homework done, it's that they're homo superior. It's not that they're bad parents, you see, it's that they have the special burden of raising the next stage of evolution. Why yes. Yes I have met some of these mothers. Why do you ask?
Indigo souls is what I prefer to use, but I just used the term Indigo children because it is the most common term and people can look it up.
I used to think the terms were about food... so I thought Indigo kids just, like, ate a lot of blueberries.
I don't believe in the paranormal. The observable universe is more than enchanting enough for me. Still an agnostic, though. The absolute certainty of atheism doesn't suit me.
Images of gas output of corn! Great. I love it. Paranormal claims of Kirlian photography have not been observed or replicated in experiment by the scientific community.[31][32] The physiologist Gordon Stein has written that Kirlian photography is a hoax that has "nothing to do with health, vitality, or mood of a subject photographed."[33]
Dude Kirlian photography is dope. (1) clip electrodes to your subject (2) lay your subject out on a piece of film (3) zap the bejeesus out of your subject with high voltage (4) develop the resulting arc contacts. Bonus points to darlinareyousleepy for finding a pun in all of this.
What do I think on the subject or what do I think the reaction might be?
I think that the subject matter of indigo souls and crystal souls makes sense. I've encountered people in my life that seemed to have paranormal attributes that are attributed to these terms, but most of them try to explain it as common sense and science. I was expecting skepticism due to the lack of conversation of this kind of topic on hubski, however, I was and still am expecting more anecdotes.
I, for the most part, don't believe in anything. I know people who believe in God, Bigfoot and UFO's. I make no attempt to talk them out of it but I don't activly support them in that which I suspect is fun, fantastical whimsy. It's amazing how many of them think I do believe in their favorite unverifiable obsession.
Sometimes, it is just more fun to hear what nonsense people have to say. I knew someone who thought he was "head alien." I've met homeless people with more sense than the logic presented with that. Oh man...
"Are like inside" Meat. Flesh. Bones. Incredible.