Relativists say, "no, not everything is objective because each situation is different or a person might think a certain action is better morally better than another" when in reality, for each relative situation THERE IS AN OBJECTIVE TRUTH. So yes, the objective truths do change "relative to the situation," but there still is an objective truth to each of those situations. Relativists have it wrong because they think that there isn't just one answer to anything, when in reality, there is.

In both situations where you treat the cashier with bare politeness, you are doing the wrong thing. You should treat the cashier with kindness because it is virtuous and it maximizes the total happiness in the situation. It doesn't matter how you are feeling, there is an objective way to treat the cashier: with kindness.

2nd place is probably better than first in this context. It avoids all the trolls that follow everyone else to Voat.

No one sees 1+1 as 3. They see it as 2.

Precisely my point

I know it isn't bad. I was just wondering what everyone thought.

Cyanide is also natural....

So what, in your opinion, is the right sector to invest in? Perhaps the automotive industry with India's citizens have more money to buy cars and travel (luxury items). Narendra Modi has also recently spoken with the Chinese Prime Minister about opening up trading. Also, Modi said that he plans to implement A LOT of solar power within the next year (investment opportunity there?).

Read these two articles:

http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2015/02/11/its-official-india-has-passed-china-to-become-the-worlds-fastest-growing-economy/

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21651813-country-has-golden-opportunity-transform-itself-narendra-modi-risks-missing-it-indias?frsc=dg%7Cd