Oh also office style CSS is buggy when at small resolutions.

Clicking a users name in a new tab breaks CSS. Same thing with clicking the magnifying glass and opening in a new window.

Also spoiler tags can't be unhidden on iPad safari (maybe also chrome, haven't checked)

This is the smuggest and worst thing I've read in a while. Despite the huge classist and ableist and thus racist issues aside, this is literally what editors are for. Hire one, ya douche.

More fuck you, pay me by designers

mk spoiler tags can not be unhidden on iPad safari #bugski

Exactly.

its k ilu anyways

shooting stars

the surface of mars

feature requests are good signs! once you've crossed the threshold to feature requests from bug reports you know you're doing well! :D

I asked yesterday but not sure how much you've thought about it, but have you thought about setting up issue tracking software that's community facing? Trac, Github issue tracking, Jira, Redmine, etc. Could be a good idea especially if you're interested in community feedback or visibility in terms of what's in active development. It would also free up some of the meta clutter on #bugski or #hubski.

that sounds like a useful feature.

As a fairly well-known SRSer, I can tell you that most of us are extremely interested in well-thought out content focused on feminism, critical race theory, post-colonialism, queer theory, anarchism, politics.

SRSPrime, as the only forum that most people know about w.r.t the fempire is really only a place to let off steam as a reaction to browsing the rest of the ignorant internet.

I don't think that's really an issue you should be addressing. You've already fundamentally shifted the paradigm from a tag-centric browsing to a person-centric browsing. Heterogeneity of opinion comes with following people with a variety of opinions. And the freedom to curate your own content according to your own ideas about what/who is appropriate for you is much more powerful and welcome than the heavy-handed "heterogeneity is important"

can i overtly flirt with you here, finally?

mfw I didn't get a happy less than three :(

#hsdbroke

lol LL he's the brave one from SRDB modmail. The one who tried to outcopypasta us.

please be the real AADworkin, please!

It's sort of inherent in the badging system. Click "badges" under "discover" and it's the more formalized "bestof" process.

the tag cloud itself needs to die. It's overdone, unimaginative, of limited use, and terrible UX

bestofed

oh god please no. die, web 2.0, die.

it has already happened with several users.

I don't really see the issue with that or why that should be tainted as a circlejerk? Don't we already aggregate into groups based on similar interests?

A circlejerk is humorous self-deprecating fun-poking or an uber-serious mutual self-patting-on-the-back

if you read about the architecture of the site, you'd know that scaling across servers/load balancing nodes is non-trivial. And there is a huge difference between balancing API loads and regular UI loads.

Write comments/make posts that get commented on/shared/dotted

There are apparently "two tags" available. One is the single one you give to your post when you create it. The second one is one that's given by "the community" (which I think only includes people who have already completed a wheel?)

falsely impersonates a person or entity; falsely misrepresents your affiliation with a person or entity;

This in particular is interesting to me. Is someone's online moniker a distinguishable/ownable enough item that "stealing" someone's online moniker constitutes false impersonation/false misrepresentation of affiliation?

It's not really pages, and they aren't linked via blog post except tenuously.

I was considering whether making a text post with 5 links would have worked better, but I'm still getting used to the UX here.