Hi Hubski
Here's the question I want to ask hubski: Do you think self-worth and being single is a gender-related issue: men can have self-worth just by being men but women are conditioned to base self-worth on their relationships.
I've been mulling this over for a few minutes thinking about single men and women that I know. For men as well as women, self-worth comes from working in the world. Being paid is nice, but self-worth also comes from volunteer work, helping others, and contributing, different ways of being loved, I guess.
Where does your sense of self-worth come from?
I'd be interested in your thoughts.
Edit: For those who don't click the title and get to the blog - this is not my question. It really was asked of me by a human. Where most of Lil's Book of Questions come from.
Sure it's gender related, but men are absolutely conditioned to value being in a relationship. It's different, of course, but try being a lifelong bachelor and not having people treat you skeptically. Most generally, mine comes from doing. Not randomly doing something but having a goal (even a goal not consciously formed) and trying to do it. In my late 20s and early 30s, I went to a lot of live music. A lot as in "have seen the same band a hundred and twenty times in 20+ states and five countries." It became a goal of trying to do the next crazy thing and finding I was able to do it. It did devolve into a dick measuring contest at times, and that wasn't good, but the challenge and success made me feel good. That evolved to hiking and running. I'm doing a peakbagging list (hike all the mountain peaks in an area), and that's oddly similar to "if I see this concert in Ypsilanti I'll have seen them play in cities starting with 23 different letters." But it's less of a dick measuring contest because thousands of people have hiked these summits. Ditto for running. Running a half marathon or, this fall, my first full marathon is about trying to do something and succeeding at my goal. Goals in life are as diverse as the number of people. People expecting me to get married in my 20s and buy a house and have kids in my 30s is as ridiculous as me expecting them to run down the sleepy rural roads of the Ice Age Trail on the weekends. I'm less bothered by (but not oblivious to) their expectations by remembering we all live different lives. Having similar goals or courses in life is no more a feature in others than a flaw in me. And, on the individual level, the similarities start to vanish. So, my individual self worth comes from living my own life and taking satisfaction in the hobbies I enjoy.Do you think self-worth and being single is a gender-related issue: men can have self-worth just by being men but women are conditioned to base self-worth on their relationships.
Where does your sense of self-worth come from?
Three thoughts. There's a part of me that always gets excited to say the words "My wife" because the hidden meaning in that is that someone values me enough to put up with my shit for the rest of my life. That's a lot of value. My sense of self worth is partially external and partially internal. Externally, I believe the world is an amazingly beautiful place with so many exciting and wonderful things going on, even though sometimes we have a hard time seeing them. Internally, I am driven to do what I can, when I can, to reflect and perpetuate the sense of wonder I feel back into the world, so others can feel it too. Sometimes I forget to do that, because I'm often crabby, but when I do, I feel better about both myself and the world. A good work ethic is an important part of self worth. A job or a career as a social status is a crumby measurement of worth. There is a difference.
I've been married eight years and I still call my wife "my girlfriend." I also talk about earning "boyfriend points." I think I enjoy the precariousness of knowing I could blow it and lose her, and I think that boyfriend points sound more interesting and debonair than husband points. You get boyfriend points by bringing flowers. You get husband points by unclogging the toilet.
Wow... sometimes these questions come up that just boggle my mind. This is one of those. The entire conversation starts too far down the track. We gotta pull the train all the way back into the station, and start from some base principles. Number one: There is nothing someone else has that is going to "complete" you. If you are not complete and whole, you can never be a true partner to someone else. You cannot look to someone else to fill that hole inside of you, because then all you are is a suck. You aren't a partner, you are a leech. Number two: If you are not whole and comfortable with yourself, why are you even looking for a partner? How can you be fully present for them, and participatory in the relationship, if you are mentally spinning on your own shit? Who is the other person supposed to be connecting to? The 30% of you that is available to them? You are a human moving target, who isn't present and fully engaged in a mutual experience. You only have your toe in their pool, and you expect full commitment from them? That's just being an asshole. Everything anyone needs (short of an actually clinically-assessed chemical or mental imbalance) is inside of them already. Looking outside for solutions is just screwing someone else up. Because who are they? What are they looking for? Do they want a relationship with only 30% of you? I bet not. So if you engage in a relationship with them, you are lying to them. You are basing your relationship on a false premise - namely, that you are ready and prepared to be an equal partner in the relationship - and building upon a foundation of quicksand. I think people need to expand outside of their own needs, when considering a relationship partner. Your partner does not complete you. 1 plus .75 does not equal 2. That's why great relationships are 1 plus 1 = 10. Both people are bringing their full selves and A-game to the relationship, fully participating with their partner in a mutual partnership, and building something that is literally impossible for either of them to build alone. THAT is a relationship. Anything else is just using another human as your own personal crutch until they break. And that's just a shitty thing to do to another person.
One step further back: how does one become a 'whole' person, as well as illustrating such. I'd like to propose the idea that no single person really reaches enlightenment (sorry, definitely exaggerating, but not in a sarcastic sense). In other words, being 'incomplete' is the norm. Through engaging with a partner, each individual unlocks the ability to build upon themselves with a partner in good faith to reach a more wholesome state. This is based on the idea of one's attraction to another has a strong, positive correlation with values and upbringing - for better and worse. That said, through the 'worse,' one side can look to another for healing through compassion, comfort, and connection. Values aren't instilled in a void, they form through one's upbringing. Naturally, an upbringing calls for role models/guardians/parents. Through the rough times, your romantic interest has the power to enroll as the emotional and personal sounding board who can facilitate healing of wounds in the past as a partner in good faith. Inches by inches, wound by wound, progress can move forward towards a better being. Wait. I rambled somewhere in that second thought process. I guess my point was, I agree here: And those willing to take that healing a step further could be lucky enough to explore a better way to live and grow exponentially with others. What I'm sorta reading is a scenario where people seek out others to complete themselves. I agree that's not healthy for any relationship. I'd further argue that the other participant in this diad likely isn't 'wholesome' either. It's not unreasonable to presume that those who are not 'whole' or 'comfortable' with themselves may find that in those they seek romantic interest's with are seeking the same on some level. I think I mixed around a lot of sentences when trying to make this more fluid. I'd be more than happy to clarify if something didn't make sense.Number one: There is nothing someone else has that is going to "complete" you. If you are not complete and whole, you can never be a true partner to someone else. You cannot look to someone else to fill that hole inside of you, because then all you are is a suck. You aren't a partner, you are a leech.
Everything anyone needs (short of an actually clinically-assessed chemical or mental imbalance) is inside of them already.
Right... it's all about who you are, and who you can be for someone else. The bigger narrative around relationships is about "getting". "Getting" married. "Getting" a girl/boyfriend. Etc. The more powerful way to enter into an engagement with someone else is to BRING you to the party, and offer yourself, rather than take from others. It is riskier. Rejection can be brutal, when it is your heart on offer. But the one who sees your offering, and offers theirs in return? THAT's a partnership.
This made more sense to me after reading again. To clarify: The more powerful way to enter into an engagement with someone else is to BRING you to the party, and offer yourself, rather than take from others. This in the sense of the opposite being going to the party with intent to "get" or "take" someone way from that space? I found this insightful and a neat view.The bigger narrative around relationships is about "getting". "Getting" married. "Getting" a girl/boyfriend. Etc.
:-) There was a trail of broken women who really wanted to love me, but I wouldn't let them. After my first marriage broke up... and the fiancee after her left... and another girlfriend broke up with me... I finally started noticing there were patterns in my relationships. They each seemed to follow the same beats, and ended feeling the same way. I realized that all of these women were amazing people in their own right, and were committed to a relationship. So, in a moment of clarity, I realized the problem must not be with THEM... it was with ME. I had no idea where to start. So I simply stopped dating. Completely. For a year. Then I realized that I always had some sort of distraction going... music playing, TV on, whatever... I was never just silent and alone. So I tried that, and found that it was HARD. I didn't really like me. I didn't want to be with me, alone, with no distractions. So I forced myself to. And, over time, I discovered my actual self, deep down inside. Not the person I had always pretended to me, but the core ME. I got to know him. And like him. And I built a relationship with him, and thought about what that guy really wanted... not what the marketing machine and the noise and the consumer culture wanted me to think I wanted. But what I actually desired. And then I moved back to the USA, and it all fell apart again. So I rebuilt it slowly over time. And I have an astonishing relationship based on mutual respect for ourselves, and each other, and a genuine interest in what our wonder-twin powers can do. I think it is like walking through a waterfall... There is this hammering, scary, noisy wall of water. It's cold. And scary. And the ground is slippery. And you start into it, and you think you are going to be crushed by the sheer hammering weight of the water, or you'll drown, or maybe there isn't anything back here to discover at all... And it starts to get easier. And the water lessens. And you pass through the waterfall and find a lovely little enchanting grotto. And the sound of the water is a quiet shoooooshing in the background, reminding you of the difficult path you took, and making you love this lovely little spot even more. And you decide to stay.
So I rebuilt it slowly over time. Before I link your beautiful answer to everyone, please clarify what "it" means in each of those excerpts. My guesses #1: my relationship with myself and sense of self-worth and resolve not to fall into the distractions of US culture? #2: my resolve, my sense of identity #3: building a relationship? By the way, your answer is so relevant to my one-woman show, now under construction.And then I moved back to the USA, and it all fell apart again.
I think it is like walking through a waterfall...
#1, really. It's the peace with oneself that makes one whole and a good partner for someone else. "It" in this case is my sense of self. My identity. The thing one must defend against is the ease of slipping back into patterns that are not a part of who I am, yet may be perpetuated by the worldwide marketing machine that tells you that you are not enough. Aka - Don't believe the hype. (And YAY! I am glad this may play into your show somehow! Very curious about that project...)
A lot of my self worth is tied into other people because I like to be needed. I've been struggling with that lately and realized down the road I was going to end up as one of those moms who turns down help from everybody then complains that nobody helps/appreciates her. Not to mention a lot of my helping tends to be little things in the background that I don't ask for thanks over but still expect people to appreciate that I'm helping. If somebody lost something I'll help them find it, I'll research things people need help with and it goes on really. I wanted to cheer up the players who struck out while playing softball the other night on the team I was playing against. I'm not even good at the sport and I still want to help others at the very least get to my level which is sometimes hitting the ball. Go me for not getting knocked up in high school. I don't even date those guys who can't do their own laundry. I bet I could have a long frustrating relationship with one of them. So I'm thinking I should pick a career where I'm helping people, but I've also got to figure out how to appreciate myself for helping myself.
Good on you! Do you have any in mind, or passing thoughts? The last bit is crucial in my experience. It's hard to give from a place without and avoid becoming resentful.So I'm thinking I should pick a career where I'm helping people, but I've also got to figure out how to appreciate myself for helping myself.
I'm working on narrowing it down. I would like nursing and a lot of the women in my family are nurses however it's got to the point where they even recommend I don't due to how nurses are treated these days. Overworked and underpaid like crazy. It used to be a good job but now it's just not worth it. Being a doctor might be enjoyable but I'm not sure I would enjoy being a general practioner and honestly it's a lot of school/training. The massage therapy thing was alright and I really enjoyed it when I was actually fixing something but I don't enjoy it as much when it's relaxation massage. I also don't think my body could handle it for very long. Currently I'm thinking midwife so I'll mull that over for a bit and see if I'm still feeling it in a week. I would love to study something and do research but I'm not sure I would enjoy that either. I have to move around a lot in a day, it's why I work in the restaurant industry currently.
I've heard nothing but the same about the medical field coming from both my brothers' (a healthcare analyst and EMR specialist) coworkers and the token family doctor. Needless to say, on this side of the border it's hilariously silly watching progress or lack thereof on the subject. Anywho, I was thinking about what you've written here and physical therapy[ist] came to mind.
This remind me of a passage from Jiddu Krishnamurti's Freedom from the Known: This belonging to another, being psychologically nourished by another, depending on another - in all this there must always be anxiety, fear, jealousy, guilt, and so long as there is fear there is no love; a mind ridden with sorrow will never know what love is; sentimentality and emotionalism have nothing whatsoever to do with love. And so love is not to do with pleasure and desire.I think that when you're in a relationship, it's easy to get in the habit of relying on your partner for your sense of worth. I think that that's a habit that damages both partners, and it isn't often readily obvious that any damage was done until the relationship ends and one or both people are left without a sense of worth.
You say you love your wife. In that love is involved sexual pleasure, the pleasure of having someone in the house to look after your children, to cook. You depend on her; she has given you her body, her emotions, her encouragement, a certain feeling of security and well-being. Then she turns away from you; she gets bored or goes off with someone else, and your whole emotional balance is destroyed, and this disturbance, which you don't like, is called jealousy. There is pain in it, anxiety, hate and violence. So what you are really saying is, 'As long as you belong to me I love you, but the moment you don't I begin to hate you. As long as I can rely on you to satisfy my demands, sexual and otherwise, I love you, but the moment you cease to supply what I want I don't like you.' So there is antagonism between you, there is separation, and when you feel separate from another there is no love. But if you can live with your wife without thought creating all these contradictory states, these endless quarrels in yourself, then perhaps - perhaps - you will know what love is. Then you are completely free and so is she, whereas if you depend on her for all your pleasure you are a slave to her. So when one loves there must be freedom, not only from the other person but from oneself.
I look at self-worth the same way I look at motivation vs. inspiration. It has to come from within to be sustainable. Somebody can inspire (external) you to do something, but if you don't have the motivation (internal) to follow through or maintain, then it's kind of like eating a candy bar. It's good in that exact moment, but long term it doesn't provide sustenance. Self-worth is a similar topic, you can derive self-worth from your relationships with others, but if you aren't determining what your mission is, what you want to get out of the things you do, or even making an effort to try and find out what it is that you like to do, your self-worth will be fleeting. Self-worth drives actions that are lasting and tangible. But a lot of work and exploration is necessary before reaching that point.Where does your sense of self-worth come from?