This is such a stupid move that it's almost unbelievable. I get that the newspaper business needs to try different things to reduce costs but this would definitely not work. There is a reason why photojournalism is separate from news writing.

Reporters, when they look at something, have to detach themselves away from the scene and get the facts and dig for details. Photojournalists, on the other hand, have to feel the atmosphere and take the right picture that conveys that. Articles should be objective. Photos should be engaging.

By firing its photo staff, Chicago Sun-Times is actually shooting itself in the foot. It's more common for readers in social media to share pictures instead of lengthy articles. Photos attract readership in the Internet, which is obviously a possible revenue-generating avenue for the business.

When the Sandy Hook shooting took place, there was no article that went 'viral'. But a photo of a responder leading a kids away from the school did. That's because it conveyed the perfect emotion of the situation on the ground and the readers felt that.

An iPhone picture taken by an objective reporter can't do that.

Maybe the '.com' can be removed. I know its for awareness and people should know that it's a site but 'Hubski' sounds more professional and it sticks to my mind more.

I like the new layout. Actually just joined right before you changed the layout and I think it's better.

It looks great on my desktop PC but when I used my netbook, I can't see the followers and badges options because my screen is too small. Is there any way I can fix this?

No supply and demand analysis. Not economics! :))

But do you think the Constitution should prohibit political dynasties?

This is one of the things I want to experience. Especially the 'meeting new people' part. That would feel so refreshingly old-school...and spy-like.

Reagan is like the Jesus of Republicans. They always point to Reagan as the model of a good Republican but ignore the instances when what he said doesn't match their beliefs.